Message-ID: <8890392.1075853199374.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 00:20:00 -0800 (PST)
From: richard.sanders@enron.com
To: andrew.edison@enron.com
Subject: Re: Draft Letter to TJ Sattler
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Richard B Sanders
X-To: Andrew Edison
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Richard_Sanders_Oct2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: rsanders.nsf

----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 12/29/2000 08:19 AM -----

	Richard B Sanders
	11/26/2000 09:20 AM
		 
		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: Draft Letter to TJ Sattler


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 11/26/2000 09:20 AM -----

	Carey M Metz
	10/26/2000 07:11 AM
		
		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: Draft Letter to TJ Sattler

Here is a letter detailing what I feel our response should be. It makes no 
absolute statement regarding pricing errors, but does commit to the validity 
of "in the market" online trades. I do want to check the audio tapes to 
review exactly what the trader said, before we send anything back. I feel 
this letter highlights the difference between the situation on June 1 and the 
other events. I also feel this should significantly quiet their stance.
